Friday, June 29, 2012

Judge Roberts and Taxes

So let me get this straight.   Judge Roberts' opinion holds that the penalty for violating the individual mandate is not a tax for the purpose of determining whether the Court could rule on its constitutionality before it is enforced (under the Anti-Injunction Act).  But, he indicates that  the penalty is a tax when assessing its constitutionality. 

What am I missing here?   Is it a tax or not?  This is complete nonsense. 

No comments:

Post a Comment